Everything vs Windows Search: which one actually finds your files?
Last updated: · written by the FileLocator team
This is the comparison most Windows users should read before installing anything. Everything (by voidtools) is the free tool power users swear by; Windows Search is already on your PC, wired into Explorer, the Start menu and Outlook. They sound interchangeable. They are not — they solve two different problems, and picking the wrong one for your problem is why so many people think "search on Windows is broken."
The one-line version: Everything finds filenames instantly across every NTFS drive; Windows Search finds words inside your documents, but only in the folders it has been told to index. Everything answers "where did that file go?" and Windows Search answers "which file said that?" Below is what that means in practice, based on our standard 1.2-million-file test library.
How each one works under the hood
The difference in results comes straight from the difference in architecture, so it's worth two paragraphs.
Everything doesn't crawl your folders at all. It reads the NTFS Master File Table directly — the volume's own record of every file and folder — and then watches the USN change journal to stay current. That means it knows about every filename on every NTFS volume within seconds of first launch, with no warm-up period and no "still indexing" phase you can feel. On our test machine the database covering 1.2 million files held steady at roughly 100 MB of RAM and rebuilt from scratch in well under a minute. The trade-off: out of the box it only knows names, sizes, dates and paths — not what's written inside the files. (Recent versions can index content for selected folders, but that's an opt-in extra, not its core job. Our full Everything review covers it.)
Windows Search takes the opposite approach: a background indexer crawls a chosen set of locations — by default your user folders, the Start menu and Outlook data — and builds a database of filenames, file properties and the text inside common formats: Office documents, PDFs, text files, email and more. That's a genuinely bigger job, which is why the index takes hours to build, why the SearchIndexer process occasionally chews CPU at idle, and why anything outside the indexed locations falls back to a slow, on-demand crawl.
Side-by-side comparison
| Category | Everything | Windows Search |
|---|---|---|
| Speed (filename) | Instant — results update as you type, even across 1.2M files | Fast inside indexed folders; seconds to minutes (or incomplete) outside them |
| Content search | Not by default; opt-in content indexing for chosen folders only | Yes — indexes text and properties of Office files, PDFs, email and more |
| Regex | Full regex plus its own rich filter syntax | No regex; AQS keywords like kind: and datemodified: only |
| UI | Dedicated lightweight search window; spartan but fast | Built into Explorer, Start menu, Outlook — no separate app |
| Price | Free (donations accepted) | Free — included with Windows |
| Platforms | Windows only; full speed requires NTFS volumes | Windows only; works on any file system Windows mounts |
| Indexing approach | Reads the NTFS MFT + USN journal — whole drive, ~100 MB RAM in our testing | Selective background crawler — chosen locations only, larger on-disk index |
Filename search: not a close race
In our testing, this is a blowout. Typing a partial filename into Everything returned matches from anywhere on three NTFS volumes as fast as we could type — effectively zero wait. The same queries in Explorer were fine when the target sat in an indexed library, took several seconds when it didn't, and on a folder tree of around 200,000 unindexed files sometimes never finished at all — the green progress bar crawling while we found the file in Everything, copied it and moved on.
Everything's filter syntax widens the gap. Queries like *.psd dm:lastweek size:>200mb or a full regular expression run just as instantly, and you can sort a whole drive by size or date in one click. Explorer's kind: and datemodified: keywords cover some of the same ground — our Windows file search guide walks through them — but they're slower, less precise and undiscoverable unless you already know they exist.
Content search: where Windows Search earns its keep
Flip the task to "find the document containing Q3 renewal pricing" and the picture reverses. Windows Search has already read your documents, so content queries in indexed folders come back in a second or two, including hits inside Word files, PDFs and Outlook mail — straight from the Start menu, no extra software. Everything, in its default configuration, simply can't answer that question.
It's not flawless: results depend on the right filter (iFilter) being installed for each format, scanned PDFs without OCR are invisible, and anything outside the index is a slow grind. If content search is your daily workload, see our guide to searching file contents on Windows — dedicated tools like Agent Ransack beat both options here.
Taming the built-in: Enhanced mode, locations, exclusions
Before you write Windows Search off, ten minutes of configuration fixes most complaints. Under Settings → Privacy & security → Searching Windows you can switch from Classic to Enhanced mode, which indexes the entire PC rather than just libraries — closer to Everything's coverage, at the cost of a longer initial index (plan on several hours) and a bigger database. The same screen lets you exclude noisy folders like node_modules or build directories, which shrinks the index and speeds up everything else. If the indexer itself is misbehaving — stuck, bloated or eating CPU — our fix slow Windows Search guide covers rebuilding the index and the service-level repairs step by step.
When the built-in is genuinely enough
Honest answer: a lot of people don't need Everything. If you're a single user who keeps files in Documents, Desktop and Downloads, searches mostly by content or recent activity, and lives in Outlook, the stock experience is fast, integrated and zero-maintenance. Where it breaks down is exactly where Everything shines: whole-drive hunts, secondary data drives and other exotic locations the index ignores, six-figure file counts, and power filters or regex. Most heavy users we know end up running Everything alongside Windows Search rather than instead of it — and if you want a launcher-style frontend on top, our Everything vs Listary comparison covers that pairing.
Choose Everything if… / Choose Windows Search if…
Choose Everything if: you search by filename more than by content; your files spill across multiple drives or outside the default user folders; you manage huge file counts (developers, photographers, data hoarders); you want regex, size/date filters and instant whole-drive sorting; or Explorer search has ever left you staring at a progress bar. It's free, tiny and takes two minutes to install.
Choose Windows Search if: you mainly need to find words inside documents and email; your files live in the standard libraries; you value Start menu and Outlook integration over raw speed; or you're on a locked-down work machine where installing software isn't an option. Spend your ten minutes on Enhanced mode and exclusions instead.
And if neither quite fits — you need deep content search with boolean logic, or Mac/Linux coverage — start with our full best file search software roundup, where both of these tools are ranked against eight alternatives.
See how both rank against 8 other search tools
Our full roundup tests Everything, Windows Search, Agent Ransack and more on the same 1.2M-file library.
keep exploring
Related reading
Everything review
The full hands-on review: syntax, filters, the HTTP/ETP server and the portable build.
Fix slow Windows Search
Rebuild the index, tune indexing options and repair the service before you replace it.
Everything vs Listary
Raw speed versus workflow integration — and why many power users run both.